Preliminary analysis prepared independently by House Strategies Group LLC from public data, for the City of Frederick's supplier diversity assessment and disparity study, RFP-27-08, released August 6, 2026. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the City of Frederick. Every figure carries its source and its limits. Not a procurement-disparity finding.

Module · Our own analysis, before award

Five years of awards, rebuilt and then tested twice

This module is work we did before this contract existed, using only documents anyone can download. It runs in three parts: we rebuild the City's award record from adopted Council minutes, then test the firms in it against Maryland's certified directory, then against the federal registry. Each part answers a little and stops at a different edge. Where all three stop is the finding.

1
The record
152 awards, $92.3M, rebuilt from 657 Council documents
2
Ownership
7 of 55 firms in Maryland's certified directory
3
Size
18 of 55 confirmed federally; 67% of value has no federal record
Read this before you read any number on this page
These figures are ours, not the City's. They are an independent reconstruction built to test whether public records can support a utilization measurement. They cannot. Nothing here is a disparity finding, nothing here is a utilization rate, and every figure is a floor rather than a rate. Under the study protocol all of it will be rebuilt from City-controlled records.
Part 1 of 3Adopted Council minutes

The record we rebuilt, and what it structurally cannot answer

We indexed the City's Archive Center, machine-read every Council meeting document since July 2021, and extracted every contract, agreement, purchase order, task order, and amendment the Council approved.

Distinct awards recovered
152
2021-07-01 through 2026-08-06
Total award value
$92.3M
Median award $204,663
Records identifying owner demographics
0
Not one, at any level of effort
Value in awards above $1 million
62.4%
13 contracts, $57,619,243
Award value by fiscal year
FY2022
$7.9M27 awards
FY2023
$39.6M26 awards
FY2024
$9.3M28 awards
FY2025
$19.1M35 awards
FY2026
$16.2M33 awards
FY2027
$0.3M3 awards

Council-approved awards only, July-to-June fiscal year. FY2027 is partial, through the RFP release date. The FY2023 spike is a single $19.8 million design-build award for the Police Headquarters.

Who the counterparties are
Named private firms
84 · $57.8M
Government and intergovernmental
12 · $2.2M
Nonprofit grants and sponsorships
3 · $117,304
No firm named in the minutes
53 · $32.2M

55 distinct private firms across five years. A third of award value cannot be attributed to any firm without pulling the underlying agenda packets.

The largest recovered awards
Waynesboro Construction Company, Inc$19,816,4781 award
Triangle Contracting LLC$7,196,0191 award
LB Water Services$7,000,0001 award
Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc$3,999,4951 award
ATC Corp$1,415,8415 awards
Hummer Turfgrass Systems, Inc$1,390,2383 awards

The five largest identified firms hold 68.2 percent of named private-firm dollars, and the ten largest hold 78 percent. Every one of the biggest awards is construction or utility work, which is where subcontracting happens and where the public record goes silent.

Four structural reasons this record cannot produce a utilization rate

Two further limits, unattributed awards and unresolved entity names, are ordinary and fixable with records the City already holds. These four are structural, and they define what the study has to build rather than collect.

No ownership demographics, anywhere
Not one of the 152 records identifies the race, ethnicity, or gender of a firm's owners. A utilization rate has to be built by matching firms to certification rosters and, where those fall short, collecting directly from the firms themselves.
No subcontractor layer
Council approves prime awards. The City's own 2021 study found only 27 percent of primes kept subcontractor records. Since 62.4 percent of value sits in 13 large construction and utility contracts, the layer that matters most is the one entirely absent.
Truncated at the approval threshold
Only awards at or above the Council approval threshold appear here. The band beneath it is where administrative purchasing happens and where the Small Business Reserve Program actually operates.
Award value, not spend
Change orders, contingency draws, unexercised options, and terminations leave no trace in adopted minutes. Award value overstates some contracts and understates others, unpredictably.
Part 2 of 3Maryland Directory of Certified Firms

Ownership, as far as a state certification directory can answer it

Award records carry no ownership demographics, so we did the nearest thing the public record allows and matched all 55 named private firms against the Maryland Department of Social and Economic Mobility's directory, the successor to MDOT's minority business office. Seven matched. This is a proxy for ownership, not a measurement of it.

Firms matched to the state directory
7 of 55
11 awards, $3,886,798
Share of named private-firm value
6.72%
4.21% of all award value
To Black-owned firms
0.15%
One contract, $89,540, certified 15 days after the award
Certified firms based in Frederick
114
2 received a Council award in five years
Share of named private-firm value, by owner group
Female
5.33%$3,080,588
Hispanic American / Female
1.24%$716,670
African American
0.15%$89,540
Asian American, Native American, other
0.00% $0

Denominator is the $57,797,728 that went to named private firms, not all award value. Nearly all matched value is woman-owned. No Asian American or Native American certified firm appears anywhere in the five-year series.

Firm as awardedDirectory listingBased inStatusCertifiedValue
ATC CorpATC CORP, DBA American Tennis Courts, Inc.Baltimore, MDFemale1997-06-25$1,415,841
DSM Properties, LLCDSM PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA DSM ContractingBaltimore, MDFemale2018-06-05$899,848
A&S ConstructionA&S Construction LLCFrederick, MDHispanic American / Female2024-03-13$598,926
Empire Landscape, LLCEmpire Landscape, LLCSilver Spring, MDFemalere-evaluated 2026-08-17$494,350
Daft, McCune and Walker, IncDaft-McCune-Walker, Inc.Towson, MDFemale2012-06-06$270,549
Absolute Service Industries, LLCABSOLUTE SERVICE INDUSTRIES, LLCBaltimore, MDHispanic American / Female2013-05-02$117,744
HWA CorpHWA Corp.Frederick, MDAfrican American2025-06-20$89,540
The band the Small Business Reserve was built for is the band this record cannot see
114 certified firms list a Frederick address. Two received a Council-approved award across five years, together worth $688,466. Not all of those firms work in trades the City buys, and Council-threshold awards are large while certified firms here skew small. Both qualifications point the same way: the competition that matters happens beneath the approval threshold, where the public record goes dark.
Why this is a floor and not a utilization rate
  • State certification is not City certification. The Small Business Reserve is the City's own program with its own criteria; a firm can qualify for one and not the other.
  • The directory is a snapshot as of 2026-08-17, not certification status at the time of each award. HWA Corp. is a concrete example: certified fifteen days after the award counted here.
  • Firms that are minority- or woman-owned but never sought certification are invisible to this method. It measures certification, not ownership.
  • Fifty-two awards worth $32.2 million name no firm at all in the adopted minutes, so the true numerator could be higher. The percentages below are shares of NAMED private-firm value, not of all award value, unless stated.
  • Matching is substring search plus manual verification. Two passes produced a false negative that a third pass caught, so further false negatives cannot be ruled out. Every figure here is a floor, not a ceiling.
  • The USDOT interim final rule of 2025-10-03 placed all DBE and ACDBE certifications under re-evaluation, so certification status is itself in flux and the directory says these entries may not currently be used to meet contract goals.
Part 3 of 3Federal registry, via SAM and USASpending

Size and federal status, and where all three sources run out

We ran the same 55 firms against the federal registry, where SAM registration carries both business size and self-certified ownership. It answers for barely a quarter of the money, and it disagrees with Maryland on at least one firm. Three public sources, three different blind spots.

Federal registration confirmed
18 of 55
$15,144,200, 26% of named value
No federal registration at all
67%
23 firms, $38,687,966
Registered as small businesses
$13.0M
14 firms · 4 registered other than small ($2,124,190)
8(a), HUBZone, or SDVOSB firms
Zero
Anywhere in five years of the series
The four largest awards, in both registries
FirmMD certifiedFederalValue
Waynesboro Construction Company, IncNoNo record$19,816,478
Triangle Contracting LLCNosmall, Frederick$7,196,019
LB Water ServicesNoNo record$7,000,000
Mid-Atlantic Utilities, IncNoNo record$3,999,495

Three of the four firms holding 41 percent of five years of award value appear in neither registry. The fourth is a Frederick small business, a genuine and welcome finding, and the only thing either source could tell us about this money.

Where two public sources disagree

MUSCO Sports Lighting is flagged minority-owned in the federal registry and does not appear in Maryland's certified directory at all. Both statements are accurate. Federal socioeconomic status is self-certified by the registrant; Maryland certification requires documentation and review.

A study that leans on either source alone inherits its error. That is not an argument for distrusting registries, it is the reason the availability survey has to ask firms directly and verify what it is told.

DSM Properties runs the other way and corroborates cleanly: woman-owned in Maryland's directory, woman-owned and WOSB federally. Agreement is possible. It just cannot be assumed.

SourceWhat it givesWhat it cannot giveAward value it speaks to
Adopted Council minutesDate, amount, instrument, and usually a firm nameOwnership, size, subcontractors, and everything beneath the approval threshold63% names a private firm; 35% names no firm at all
Maryland certified directoryDocumented minority and woman ownership, for firms that certifiedFirms that never certified, City SBE status, and status as of the award date6.7% of named private-firm value matched
Federal registry, via SAMBusiness size and self-certified ownership, for federally active firmsFirms with no federal history, and any verification of what was self-certified26% of named private-firm value confirmed
What the federal pass can and cannot support
  • USASpending covers only firms with federal award history. Absence means no federal footprint, NOT evidence about size or ownership.
  • Federal socioeconomic flags are self-certified in SAM and are not verified the way Maryland certification is, which requires documentation.
  • Matching is by name plus geography. Ten out-of-region matches were set aside rather than counted, so coverage is deliberately conservative.
  • Size status is as currently registered, not as of the award date.

Four matches were rejected outright as different entities: Mead & Hunt, A&S Construction, Gavin Communications LLC, Tan Consulting, LLC. Ten more were set aside as registered outside the market area. Both sets are published in the data file rather than quietly dropped.

So the study collects rather than queries
A census attempt on the market universe rather than a sample; ownership checked against certification rosters where they exist and asked directly where they do not; the subcontract layer rebuilt from City records and prime reporting, which is the gap the county's study died on; and the frame, instrument, response rates by stratum, and nonresponse analysis all published as we go, so anyone attacking the denominator finds it already in the open.

The full record

All 152 awards, with the source passage on every row

Sort any column, filter by fiscal year or counterparty type, search the passages, and export what you see. The passage column is the actual sentence from the adopted minutes or voting record that produced the row, so any figure here can be traced back to its source document.

ApprovedFYFirm or counterpartyInstrumentAmount▼CounterpartySource passage
Aug 20222023Waynesboro Construction Company, Incagreement$19,816,478privateagreement with Waynesboro Construction Company, Inc in the amount of $19,816,478 for design-build services for the new Frederick Police Department Headquarters (RFP 22-E / CIP 21009) 8
Nov 20222023not named in the minutespurchase order$7,588,350unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $7,588,350 3
Nov 20242025Triangle Contracting LLCcontract$7,196,019privatecontract with Triangle Contracting LLC for the not-to-exceed amount of $6,541,835 and a purchase order in the amount of $7,196,019 for the construction of Motter Avenue area stormwater improvements
Sep 20252026LB Water Servicespurchase order$7,000,000privatepurchase order in the amount of $7,000,000 to LB Water Services for compatible modern meters
Jun 20232023Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Incagreement$3,999,495privateagreement with Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc in the not- to-exceed amount of $3,797,495 and issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $3,999,495 for Water Loss Reduction (North East Street) (RFP 23-K / CIP 360009) 4
Feb 20222022not named in the minutespurchase order$2,200,061unidentifiedPurchase Order in the amount of $2,200,060.78 2
Sep 20232024not named in the minutespurchase order$1,800,000unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $1,800,000.00 for the construction of a traffic signal and other improvements at Yellow Springs Road and Tuscanney Drive (IFB 23-7) ALDERMAN MOTION SECOND YES NO ABSTAIN NOT PRESENT NASH X RUSSELL X SHACKELFO
Aug 20222023not named in the minutespurchase order$1,752,555unidentifiedPurchase Order in the amount of $1,752,555.20 10
Mar 20252025not named in the minutespurchase order$1,668,867unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $1,668,867.20 (RFP 25-J / CIP 330008 / F-F-14B) There were no public comments
Oct 20222023not named in the minutescontract$1,293,661unidentifiedcontract and issuance of a purchase order to HMF Paving Contractors, Inc in the amount of $1,293,661.25 for FY 2023 for miscellaneous concrete repairs (IFB 23-2) 2
Nov 20232024not named in the minutespurchase order$1,216,011unidentifiedpurchase order in the not-to-exceed amount of $1,216,011 for fiscal year 2024 (IFB FY24-3)
Mar 20252025not named in the minutespurchase order$1,087,746unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $1,087,745.76 2
Jul 20242025not named in the minutesagreement$1,000,000unidentifiedagreement in the amount of $1,000,000 from the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) Strategic Demolition Fund for site prep at Downtown Hotel and Conference Center (SDF-2024-Frederick-00300)
Oct 20222023DSM Properties, LLCcontract$899,848privatecontract with DSM Properties, LLC in the amount of $899,848.00 for the Culler Lake Park Improvements Project and issuance of a Purchase Order in the amount of $ 949,848
Jul 20212022not named in the minutespurchase order$869,408unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $869,408.50 for the construction of a traffic signal and other improvements at the Christopher’s Crossing and Opossumtown Pike Intersection (CIP #320018) 2
Sep 20252026not named in the minutespurchase order$867,895unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $867,895 for the Trinity School Pump Station Upgrades Design/Build (CIP# 370017) COUNCIL MEMBER MOTION SECOND YES NO ABSTAIN NOT PRESENT NASH X RUSSELL X X SHACKELFORD X KUZEMCHAK X X MACSHANE X COUNCIL MEMBE
Aug 20222023AMT Engineeringagreement$861,887privateagreement with AMT Engineering in the amount of $861,887 for the design of the Golden Mile Multimodal Access Plan (RFP 21-N)
Oct 20252026Hummer Turfgrass Systems, Incpurchase order$858,638privatepurchase order in the amount of $858,638 to Hummer Turfgrass Systems, Inc for the construction of three athletic fields at Westside Regional Park
Oct 20232024not named in the minutescontract$855,555unidentifiedcontract with ‘Rummel, Klepper & Kohl, LLP in the not-to- exceed amount of $777,777 and issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $855,555 to provide design and construction administration services for improvements to the Downtown Drain
Oct 20232024Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLPcontract$777,777privatecontract with Rummel, Klepper & Kohl, LLP in the not-to-exceed amount of $777,777 and issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $855,555 to provide design and construction administration services for improvements to the Downtown Drainag
Aug 20242025JF Petroleum Groupagreement$743,643privateagreement with JF Petroleum Group in the amount of $743,643.38 for the replacement of underground storage tanks
Feb 20262026not named in the minutespurchase order$669,235unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $669,234.57 (includes contingency) for the design of a traffic circle and of traffic improvements on South Jefferson Street at the intersections of Prospect Boulevard, Pearl Street, Catoctin Avenue, and Bradd
Jun 20252025not named in the minutespurchase order$643,690unidentifiedpurchase order in the amount of $643,690.28 (RFP 25-L / CIP #480161) 3
Jun 20252025A&S Constructioncontract$598,926privatecontract with A&S Construction in the amount of $598,925.72 and issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $643,690
Aug 20242025Hasen Global LLCcontract$593,501privatecontract with Hasen Global LLC in the amount of $593,501 for professional services associated with design and construction of the 7th Street Fountain Park Revitalization and Renovation, Phase I, Fountain Restoration/Renovation (RFP 25-CC) 2

152 of 152 awards in view, $92,288,701 in award value. Click any column header to sort. Exports reflect the current filter and sort order.

Page 1 of 7
How it was built, and how to check it
  • 657 documents indexed across the two public Archive Center series, Council Regular Meeting Minutes and Voting Records; 223 fell inside the window and were machine-read, with 0 read failures.
  • 266 raw award passages were extracted. 108 appeared in both series and were merged on date and amount, since the minutes and the voting record cover the same meetings.
  • Same-day contract and purchase-order pairs covering one procurement were counted once. The purchase order typically carries contingency the contract does not, so the larger figure is kept and the pair is not double-counted.
  • One amount written with a comma where a decimal belongs was corrected. Taken literally it would have inflated the series by 72 percent, which is a fair illustration of why machine extraction needs a human reading the residuals.
  • Every vendor name was then hand-curated against its own source passage, which recovered two firms the parser had missed entirely and moved one state agency and three nonprofit grants out of the procurement series.

Source: Award series: City of Frederick Archive Center, Council Regular Meeting Minutes and Voting Records, both public series, indexed and extracted by House Strategies Group on 17 August 2026. Certification: Maryland Department of Social and Economic Mobility Directory of Certified Firms. Federal: USASpending.gov recipient profiles carrying SAM registration business types. Vendor names appear as the adopted minutes spell them and are not resolved to legal entities. These are HSG figures, not City figures, and every one will be rebuilt from City-controlled records under the final study protocol.